Search found 138 matches
- Thu Aug 18, 2011 2:32 pm
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Minor Bug with LS win.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18457
Re: Minor Bug with LS win.
On Win7 x64 now working with up to 4 instances of LS (64 channels). I can reproduce this even without started front-end. So, I guess this is not Fantasia issue. Also, it looks like that this bug has not been recently introduced - it also shows up on versions several months old. I don't have a debug...
- Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:36 pm
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Do I have to enable disk streaming somewhere?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5356
Re: Do I have to enable disk streaming somewhere?
You can also try the latest version from today.
- Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:32 pm
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Minor Bug with LS win.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18457
Re: Minor Bug with LS win.
I've just committed a fix in Fantasia for this. Now it should work properly.
- Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:01 pm
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Do I have to enable disk streaming somewhere?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5356
Re: Do I have to enable disk streaming somewhere?
Hi, You don't need to enable disk streaming. I can see two possible reasons for your problem. The first one is recently introduced increased memory usage of the sfz engine, which will be fixed at some later point. So, you can try with an older version of LS, for example this one . The other one is i...
- Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:12 pm
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Minor Bug with LS win.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18457
Re: Minor Bug with LS win.
This was a bug in LS, which I introduced with the recent changes and I think it's now fixed. Thanks for pointing it out! For the sampler to work properly we should not allocate memory from a real-time thread. So, we need to reserve some memory in advance. I decided to set some values for the new mod...
- Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:33 am
- Forum: Sponsored Features
- Topic: Offset and LFO
- Replies: 12
- Views: 41749
Re: Offset and LFO
I don't understand why lfoN_phase_onccX must be set to 360, but it's the only value that make to whole thing to work :) . For example, if we have a LFO with a sine wave and lfoN_pan=100, one full cycle (0-360) can be divided into four sub-cycles: 1. Going from center to hard right (0-90) 2. Going f...
- Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:27 pm
- Forum: Sponsored Features
- Topic: Offset and LFO
- Replies: 12
- Views: 41749
Re: Offset and LFO
Yes, that's exactly what I'm trying to achieve. I'm thinking of a LFO that runs indipendently and feeds the instrument's parameters. I searched in the LS SFZ Reference, and maybe the only way to do that, is to implement lfoN_phase_onccX , so I can send a midi cc to LS with an external program. I th...
- Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:32 pm
- Forum: Sponsored Features
- Topic: Offset and LFO
- Replies: 12
- Views: 41749
Re: Offset and LFO
I've just implemented lfoN_phase and lfoN_phase_onccX.
- Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:04 pm
- Forum: Sponsored Features
- Topic: Offset and LFO
- Replies: 12
- Views: 41749
Re: Offset and LFO
Many thanks to Grigor! Now I can start using my library with LS :-) You are welcome. I notice that the LFO's value is being reset on every "note on": If I play a note with a drum sound (like a hi-hat) with a lfoN_pan, I hear the same panning every time I play that note. I think this is the expected...
- Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:08 pm
- Forum: Sponsored Features
- Topic: Offset and LFO
- Replies: 12
- Views: 41749
Re: Offset and LFO
I've just implemented and the last one - lfoN_wave with the following options:
0: triangle
1: sine
2: pulse 75%
3: square (pulse 50%)
4: pulse 25%
5: pulse 12.5%
6: saw up
7: saw down
0: triangle
1: sine
2: pulse 75%
3: square (pulse 50%)
4: pulse 25%
5: pulse 12.5%
6: saw up
7: saw down