Search found 632 matches
- Sat May 30, 2009 2:57 pm
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Features you want to see implemented next? (Jun. 2009)
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4055
Features you want to see implemented next? (Jun. 2009)
This is the official next features poll where you can vote the features/bugs you want to see implemented/fixed sooner than later. This is a series of monthly polls, features will be removed in new polls as they get implemented and new will be added along the way. You get two votes to spend per month...
- Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:44 pm
- Forum: 100% Project Unrelated
- Topic: LADSPA plugins
- Replies: 1
- Views: 16806
- Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:27 pm
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
Great to hear!
- Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:44 pm
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
Ok, it start to feel like all I do is talking to myself these days. Something I hope will change now as I need some help. Can I take you up on your offer Grishata? I have now typed up most of the LinuxSampler SFZ Implementaton chart. It probably still contain some mistakes and omissions (or rather I...
- Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:00 am
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
Now I'm just anal and documenting everything that won't be supported by LinuxSampler. Like SFZ v1 stuff that can be considered deprecated.
(Funny how "deprecated" has a connotation in the developers vocabulary compared to the standard usage.)
(Funny how "deprecated" has a connotation in the developers vocabulary compared to the standard usage.)
- Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:30 am
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
Yes, new opcodes were required for Steinway, and also for the porting of GPO/JABB. We however added them following the "style" of the other pre-existing opcodes, so that it all felt like a logical progression, or that they would fill some obvious oversights in the spec. (For instance amplitude and ...
- Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:10 am
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
Yeah. I'm going to go through my chart and start to strike out stuff that's either Cakewalk specific or that I don't intend to support to begin with or at all. Good, no shame in it, theres plenty of stuff i dont yet support from Dimension Pro. :) My first step has just been to get a complete overal...
- Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:02 am
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
1) The meaning of opcodes found in the filter and modulator tables ending with: *_smoothccN, *_stepccN, *_curveccN? Smooth is a low pass filter on speed of parameter changes and its in ms. Example from one of my SFZs from Microsoft Songsmith (you can download that for free btw - not sure it runs in...
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:16 pm
- Forum: New Sampler Engine
- Topic: SFZ
- Replies: 57
- Views: 191531
Re: SFZ
Status update I finally start to see the end of the definition file parsing bit of libsfz and hope to be concentrating on the articulation API bit soonish rather than lateish. For the record, I asked about a clarification of the SFZ2 spec yesterday: I have still got problems wrapping my head around...
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:27 am
- Forum: General LinuxSampler Discussion
- Topic: Sampling itunes w/Linux sampler (too complicated for me?)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3254
Re: Sampling itunes w/Linux sampler (too complicated for me?)
I was tempted to simply answer: Yes. But... If it's an MP3 why not just open it in Audacity or any other sound editor to extract the samples you need? Of course you will need to seek permission (a "release" in legalease) from the right holder to the song you're sampling (unless you're using somethin...