Which LADSPA FX would you add to a LS plugin?
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:59 pm
I am not making any promises, but now that FLAM is out it is time to give some love to ls16, which will actually become ls1 and reduce its memory footprint, and qgiged will come next some time this year. As time allows, as per usual.
So, would it make sense to integrate optional FX into an hypothetical LS plugin GUI? Or should they be kept separate? And if it does makes sense, which of the available LADSPAs would you choose and why? RV? EQ? Compressor?
Again, don't get your hopes up, remember this is free software. But do speculate, even if it only ends up being just for the sake of it.
So, would it make sense to integrate optional FX into an hypothetical LS plugin GUI? Or should they be kept separate? And if it does makes sense, which of the available LADSPAs would you choose and why? RV? EQ? Compressor?
Again, don't get your hopes up, remember this is free software. But do speculate, even if it only ends up being just for the sake of it.